<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: False Marking Statute Decision: Fine is for Falsely Marking Articles with a Patent Number on a Per Article Basis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inventlaw.wordpress.com/2010/01/05/false-marking-statute-decision-fine-is-for-falsely-marking-articles-with-a-patent-number-on-a-per-article-basis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inventlaw.wordpress.com/2010/01/05/false-marking-statute-decision-fine-is-for-falsely-marking-articles-with-a-patent-number-on-a-per-article-basis/</link>
	<description>What Inventors and Businesses Need to Know -- By Neustel Law Offices, LTD (www.Neustel.com)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 19:09:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
</channel>
</rss>

